*TeX is also pretty futzy to use for projects that involve graphics, and despite the "focus on the text" philosophy that is supposedly at the heart of the system, its actual markup is very intrusive and often not human-readable. This is only true if you are talking about straight typesetting with few or no floats even then, the basic *TeX fonts and templates are pretty shitty looking (not to mention incredibly dated, by typographic standards), and to achieve a decent layout design takes some time and significant tweaking. For most people, it simply isn't worth the time investment, nor the hassle.įor anything larger than a shopping list or summary of a meeting it's much easier and will look a lot better. Plus, compile times for complicated documents can be obnoxiously long (for example, if citing many refs from a bib file, or using an internal-linking package), and there is the time involved in learning to compile (or use an editor). It has a significant initial investment of time in order to learn how to use it, which for many people is more precious than a few dollars.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |